Today's Moment
About Mass MomentsContact
Massachusetts Foundation for the Humanities
TimelineMap

Radio Moment
[play] [download]

Need help with audio file?

Listen to Mass Moments
on the radio.

Source Document

Newspaper article, 1919

Discussion Board

Discuss this and other Mass Moments on our discussion board.

There are currently 0 posts on this moment.
 

Find related moments by category:

Firsts
Women's History
Industry
Strikes
Labor

eMoments

Receive the daily Mass Moment in your email.
Sign up for eMoments.
 

Receive the daily
Mass Moment as a
Podcast or RSS Feed.
 

Telephone Operators Strike
Image Credit 

On This Day...
      ...in 1919, striking telephone operators in Massachusetts won the right to negotiate with the New England Telephone Company. The young, single women who had flooded into the industry in the early 1900s wanted higher wages and better working conditions. When they took off their headsets and walked off the job, they brought business in New England to a standstill. Government officials and industry executives were surprised by the women's organization and determination. In less than a week, the phone company agreed to the strikers' demands. The victorious operators returned to work, but within a few years, they would face a greater threat: the self-dial telephone. Manually-operated switchboards would soon be more common in museums than city telephone offices.

For the first few decades after telephones became common in American households, people rang an operator to place their calls. A voice responded, "Number please?" and the caller's line was manually plugged into the appropriate connection on a switchboard.

The very first telephone operators were men, but within a year managers decided that women were better suited to the job than men. The first female operator in Boston was hired in 1878 after customers complained that the male operators were too gruff. Although they were paid much less than men, women considered it more "professional" to work as a telephone operator than in a factory, retail establishment, or domestic service. They flocked to the new field in such large numbers that, by World War I, over 8,000 women were employed as telephone operators in New England alone.

It may have been a desirable job but it was not an easy one. Telephone companies had strict rules for all aspects of operators' behavior on the job. Merely to get the job, a woman had to pass height, weight, and arm length tests to ensure that she could work in the tight quarters afforded switchboard operators. Operators had to sit with perfect posture for long hours in straight-backed chairs. They were not permitted to communicate with each other. They were to respond quickly, efficiently, and patiently — even when dealing with the most irascible customers.

All this took place under the watchful eye of supervisors. Minor mistakes were punished with detention, as if the women were school children. The New England Telephone Company magazine reminded its operators, "Telephone calls are not telephone calls at all, they are acts of service. . ."

As the telephone industry grew dramatically in the early 1900s, so too did the pressure on the operators. Under a strict regimen that they likened to military discipline, the operators were expected to work at what one called an "intensely nervous pace." Telephone companies extended the workday by introducing the "split trick" schedule: operators worked two separate shifts in one day with a three-hour unpaid break in-between. Despite the demands of the work, telephone operators were poorly paid.

In 1912 operators began to organize for greater control over their work environment and better pay. The campaign was led by Julia O'Connor — like many of the operators, a young, single, Irish-American woman — who had worked briefly on a switchboard before becoming so dissatisfied with the conditions that she quit and dedicated herself to organizing a union for operators.

O'Connor had allies in Boston where many middle- and upper-class women were involved in progressive causes, such as suffrage, settlement houses, women's education, and trade unionism. With their support, the Boston operators staged a brief and successful strike in 1913. Soon union membership was growing in other Massachusetts cities, including Lynn, Springfield, Worcester, New Bedford, Framingham, Fitchburg, Salem, Lowell, Lawrence, and Haverhill.

Workers in all industries took advantage of the labor shortage during World War I to seek higher wages and better working conditions. Faced with an economic slump after the war, business leaders tried to reverse those gains; workers struggled to hold on to them. In 1919 one-fifth of the nation's industrial workers went on strike, a greater proportion than at any other time in the nation's history. In Massachusetts, a hotbed of labor militancy, textile factories, the transit system, even the Boston Police Department were hit by strikes. In April, the switchboard operators walked out.

During the war, federal authorities had given Postmaster General Albert Burleson control over telephone communications. After the war, operators sought a new contract, but Burleson refused to discuss the issue himself or allow the phone companies to negotiate. After six months of frustration, on April 15, 1919, the members of the Boston local voted to strike.

That same day telephone operators throughout New England took off their headsets, left their switchboards, and began picketing outside regional exchanges. Organized labor had not historically welcomed women, and male labor leaders at first refused to support the striking operators. American Federation of Labor head Samuel Gompers urged Julia O'Connor, now president of the operators union, to "maintain self-control and give opportunity to those who are in a position to bring about [an] honorable adjustment." But at a union meeting in Boston, one woman called out, "It took the Yankee Division to lick the Kaiser. Now let the Yankee operators lick Burleson." According to a newspaper reporter, this "utterance . . . was like a flame to gunpowder."

The strikers stayed on the picket line. The telephone had been so widely adopted in New England that the region was paralyzed. Strikebreakers hired by the company were unable to keep the system functioning. The operators now had the backing of other unions. In Boston, the police were so sympathetic that they refused to perform their traditional strikebreaking role.

Under mounting pressure from the media and Massachusetts politicians, the Postmaster General finally allowed the New England Telephone Company to negotiate directly with the operators. It took only two days to reach an agreement. The operators won a wage increase, a change in the split shift policy, and a guarantee of their right to organize.

The telephone strike of 1919 had another, unanticipated outcome. When the strike shut down the system, the telephone company decided it had to reduce its dependence on operators. Within a few years, the "automatic" dial telephone was introduced and operator assistance was no longer needed for local calls.

Sources

"Boston as Women's City," by Sarah Deutsch in Organization of American Historians Newsletter 32 (February, 2004).

Commonwealth of Toil: Chapters in the History of Massachusetts Workers and their Unions, by Tom Juravick, William F. Hartford, and James R. Green (University of Massachusetts Press, 1996).

"Julia Sarsfield O'Connor," Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers.

"Number Please: New Hampshire's Predial Telephone Operators, 1877-1920," by Judith Moyer in Women's Work in New England, 1620-1920: Dublin Seminar for New England Folklife Annual Proceedings 2001.

"Walking the Line: Women Unions, and the Electrical Industries," Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers.


 
Discuss This Moment on Our Message Board
Recent Posts: New Topic  |   Search
Topic Originator Views Replies Most Recent Post
 
Other discussions about this Moment: [go]

Discussion on other Moments: [go]
 
Teachers' Features
This past week's MomentsSundayMondayTuesdayWednesdayThursdayFridaySaturday
Massachusetts Foundation for the Humanities

©2017 Massachusetts Foundation for the Humanities. All rights reserved.